The Ministry of Education announced a slew of changes to secondary school streaming today. They will take effect from 2020 to 2027.
Here are the secondary school streaming changes at a glance.
Changes in 2020
About 25 secondary schools will have full subject-based banding. this means students can take subjects at a higher or lower level, depending on their abilities.
For example, a Normal (Academic) student could take English at Express stream level. This will extend to all secondary schools progressively.
Changes in 2024
No more Normal and Academic streams. Kids in Primary 2 this year will be the first batch to go through a four-year secondary school curriculum, as there will be no Secondary 5.
Subject will be taught at three levels:
G1 is roughly equivalent to Normal (Technical) standard
G2 is roughly equivalent to Normal (Academic), and
G3 is roughly equivalent to Express standard
Changes in 2027
Students will take a common national examination and graduate with a common secondary school certificate, co-branded by Singapore and Cambridge. The certificate will list each subject and standard band.
Education Minister Ong Ye Kung told Parliament in his announcement today: “So from three education streams, we will now have ‘One secondary education, many subject bands’. We will no longer have fishes swimming down three separate streams, but one broad river, with each fish negotiating its own journey.”
Schools will be able to group students in different ways, not according to their abilities. He cited Boon Lay Secondary, which organises its form classes according to Co-Curricular Activities rather than academic streams, and Edgefield Secondary, where classes include students from all three streams.
Here’s more about the latest secondary school changes (article continues below video).
Will schools continue to organise students into form classes based on academic bands?
With full subject-based banding, students will take each subject at a level suited to their ability. The ministry expects to see more students taking combinations of subjects at different levels, unlike today where most students take subjects at the level of their “stream”. This gives schools a chance to reconstitute their form classes in different ways.
Doing so will allow students of different backgrounds to grow and learn together, form deeper friendships and work well together. The pilot schools will be trying out new ways of organising students in both form and subject classes. Best practices can be adopted by more schools later on.
If my child is doing well academically, will she be disadvantaged now that the form class has students of different abilities?
Students doing well academically will not be disadvantaged, says MOE.
For each subject, students will be taught in subject classes based on their ability levels. Students in the same subject class are already assessed to be able to study that subject at the same level, whether G1, G2 or G3 – so there will not be a major gap in learning abilities.
Within the same class, teachers will also further differentiate their teaching to meet the needs of the class, which is no different from today. Each student will still be challenged to learn based on his or her individual pace.
How will the secondary school posting system change?
Mr Ong says MOE has decided that it is better not to disrupt the current posting system. This means that secondary schools should continue to admit students across three PSLE scoring bands, even though the streams have been merged.
“PSLE still serves as a useful initial gauge of the subject bands that each student is most suited for at the beginning of Sec 1. So students admitted in the first PSLE scoring band will initially take mostly G1 subjects, those in the second PSLE scoring band will take mostly G2 subjects, and those in the third take mostly G3 subjects. Admitting students across three PSLE score bands will allow schools to offer subjects of all bands,” says Mr Ong.
Once they enter secondary school, the students can discover and further develop their strengths and interests, and full subject-based banding will allow them to take a combination of subjects across different bands.
There is also an important social consideration, he explained.
“Admitting students from different PSLE scoring bands into the same secondary school will ensure that our students get to make friends from diverse backgrounds. Indeed, one of the key objectives of education is forging a cohesive society.”
If students can customise their education under full subject-based banding, why do we still need to post students into secondary schools across three scoring bands, which seems similar to streaming?
The transition from Primary 6 to Sec 1 is significant for all students. Thus, it is important to ensure that students learn successfully by taking subjects suited to their learning pace and needs, says MOE.
Students’ PSLE scores still serve as a useful gauge of the pace of learning that students are most suited for at the beginning of Sec 1. But this is just at the point of admission to Sec 1 to match the suite of subjects to the students’ ability then.
Beyond Sec 1, with full subject-based banding, students will be able to take more subjects at a different or more demanding level, depending on how well they do for those subjects. It will also give students more opportunities to interact and forge friendships with peers from different backgrounds.
Will there still be Secondary 5?
By 2024, all students enrolling into Sec 1 will go through a four-year curriculum for all subject bands.
“At the end of Sec 4, in 2027, these students will attain the common certificate with various subject permutations – six G3 subjects and one G2 subject, or five G3 and two G2, or two G3, three G2 and one G1, and so on,” says Mr Ong.
“This will require us to undertake a review of our post-secondary posting system, so that students taking a combination of G1, G2 and G3 subjects can be fairly considered for ITE, polytechnics and JCs. Our review will recognise students’ particular strengths that make them suitable for specific post-secondary courses.”
As 2024 is a few years away, Mr Ong says the ministry will use this time to undertake this review.
MOE will also explore other alternatives to a fifth year in secondary schools, which may be like the Polytechnic Foundation Programme that helps students who have completed their secondary school education enter polytechnics or JCs.
Are teachers able to manage the teaching load and give every student the attention she needs?
While the introduction of subject-based banding has led to a slight increase in the overall teaching load, schools have successfully piloted new measures to implement the banding system in a way that is both effective and sustainable.
For example, schools may band classes for timetabling together, so that subject-based banding students can join subject classes at the more demanding level.
Schools also leverage the Student Learning Space to provide bridging support to subject-based banding students. This ensures teachers do not work significantly longer hours and can perform at their best.
Still, teachers may have to use different teaching styles to engage the students from different scoring bands. Teachers are trained to handle diversity within their classes and to bring out the best in every child.
MOE will continue to support teachers by providing them with resources and additional professional development to help them manage the wider range of students with full subject-based banding.
How will admission to post-secondary education institutions change under full subject-based banding?
Admission to these institutions already recognises the efforts of students who take out-of-stream subjects.
MOE will conduct a longer-term study on how admission to these institutions should be adjusted to complement the roll-out of full subject-based banding, so as to achieve the best educational outcomes for students. Refinements to the admission criteria for JCs, polytechnics and the ITE will be announced separately later.
What will happen to specialised schools like Spectra and Crest?
Meanwhile, schools with specialised programmes such as NUS High School, the School of Science and Technology, Integrated Programme schools and other schools take in only Express students.
Will MOE mandate that they take in students across three PSLE bands?
Mr Ong says there is value in having certain schools with specialised programmes. “Every education system in the world will have schools that cater specifically to different segments of learners, such as those with high academic ability, strengths in specific areas, or who prefer a more technical education,” he says.
But he admitted that the downside is the lack of mixing in these more specialised schools.
He says they must make a special effort to recruit students from all backgrounds, including through Direct School Admissions.
“They will have to ensure that students participate actively in inter-school mixing opportunities, such as combined schools CCAs, Outward Bound School camps, and Values-in-Action projects. I can see many of the principals from the specialised schools working very hard to do better in this aspect.”
At the same time, there is also scope for these specialised schools to offer more subject options. Spectra and Crest, he says, should offer more N(A) compared to today, and could possibly also offer a few Express-level subjects.
“Similarly, in time, it will also make sense for the schools that take in only Express students to offer some subjects at the N(A) or N(T) level,” says Mr Ong. “After all, customisation of education, and catering more flexibly to the varied interests and abilities of students, will benefit them.”
A version of this article first appeared in The Straits Times.